A reality check · Published by Northbank Media

What the device actually does, and what it cannot

Non-surgical body treatment is the most overclaimed category in United Kingdom aesthetics. This publication is written for the person deciding whether to spend money at all. For every treatment: what the mechanism is, what a mechanism of that kind can plausibly do, who it is a poor fit for, what a course costs over a year, and what happens when you stop.

Frost crystals growing on cold glass. This publication carries no photograph of a human body anywhere, deliberately.
Frost crystals growing on cold glass. This publication carries no photograph of a human body anywhere, deliberately.

Every claim gets one of five verdicts

Supported

The mechanism is established and the claim stays inside what that mechanism can do.

Partly supported

There is something real underneath the claim, and the claim as worded goes further than the underlying finding does.

Not established

The claim may or may not be true. Evidence able to settle it either way is not there, and the claim is being presented as though it were.

Outside the mechanism

The claim requires the treatment to do something its mechanism cannot do. This is not a question of weak evidence, it is a question of the wrong instrument.

Rules question

Whatever the science, the claim as worded raises a question under United Kingdom advertising or medicines rules, which is a separate matter from whether it is true.

The vocabulary is fixed and published, and every tag is set in the same colour, deliberately. A colour scale would turn a vocabulary into a score, and these five describe different kinds of problem rather than points on one line. No payment of any kind can influence a verdict. The full method is in our editorial standards.

Start here

Six pages that do most of the work. Together they take about half an hour, and in a sector with no licensing scheme currently in force they are the closest thing to a consumer protection that exists.

What you will not find here

No fat reduction percentages, no satisfaction rates, no session prices and no before and after outcomes, even to argue with them. Those figures are the instrument under examination, and repeating one lends it a precision it does not have.

No ranked list of clinics, and no clinic named or recommended anywhere, because we have assessed none of them. And no photograph of a human body, anywhere on this site, ever. Body photography is the most persuasive instrument in this category and the least capable of showing what it is presented as showing, and a publication examining it should not be using it. Our imagery is cool physical abstraction and the absence is the point.

What we sell instead is a paid provider listing built only from disclosed facts a reader can verify independently: alphabetical, labelled as paid, no score and no badge. The rate card and the list of things we refuse to sell at any price are on the provider listings page.

When the rules change, we will tell you

One email when a regulatory position shifts in a way that alters what you should check, when a published advertising ruling changes what this sector may claim, and when a new article goes up. No treatment offers, no discounts and no clinic suggestions, because we do not make any.

Sponsor lineThe newsletter may carry one clearly labelled sponsor line, placed after the editorial content. Sponsors see it when you do, and no payment of any kind can influence a claim verdict on this site. The rate is published on the provider listings page.